The videos shown here are from 2017 showing women becoming the first infantry marines. There have been many detractors stating this will harm or even cause disorder in the military. The complains mostly come from the right-wing political establishment, which often is seen as contradictory. The Republican Party and its right-wing supporters claim to be pro-military, but hate women who want to serve in combat roles. The social conservatives mostly see women’s roles as being less than and not equal. Standards have not been lowered to accommodate women and no special treatment has been put in place. The only reason that someone would object to women getting combat jobs is because they support sexist discrimination. There is no reason a woman should be denied a military occupational specialty, if she meets all the physical and mental standards. The idea that women are physically inferior for jobs that require strength has to be challenged. Women are getting involved in physically demanding occupations such as firefighting, construction, and law enforcement. The military seems to be the next bastion.
The fact is women fighting in wars is nothing new. Women fought in the American Civil War disguised as men for both the Union and Confederacy. During World War II Soviet women flew bombing missions and served as snipers. Dahomey had an armed force in the 19th century known as the mino warriors, which consisted of all women. The ancient world had numerous women warriors in Scythia and fighters in the Iceni tribe of Britain. Although there are documented cases of warrior queens such as Zenobia and Nzingha there are still detractors who claim that women in combat will not work. These individuals are unaware that there is no longer a traditional frontline and that women have already seen combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, even before the removal of the ban in 2013. The removal of the ban was not a “social experiment of leftists” as the far-right claimed, but understanding the reality of the military and geopolitical situation. The US wants to expand the Army with more troops and meet target goals. It would make sense to seek qualified men and women to fill any vacant positions. The nature of warfare is now moving toward wars of proxy with an emphasis on air power.
Technology has in a way helped reduce the physical burdens of soldiers. However, this has not completely negated sexual dimorphism. Men on average have higher upper body strength which is critical to certain task. More muscle mass and higher aerobic capacity means that male fitness levels exceed women’s total physical fitness levels. Women are more susceptible to musculoskeletal injuries. This means women may remain a minority in combat occupations seeing as women do not have the advantage of higher natural strength. The only solution is to have women have a high physical fitness level before entry. This would prevent failures and injuries. Before entering these jobs women must have a training regimen they do to prepare them for the physical demands. These few women that passed the tests show that it is possible for some women to do combat jobs.
Even though there are qualified women who will make it through, resentment will remain. The all male atmosphere will not be kind to women in particular. Issues of sexual assault and persistent racism in the US military continue to be persistent problems. There are more battles to be fought than ones in foreign lands. Opponents still are attempting through legislation to reimpose the ban and some are wonder what Donald Trump might do. There claims that adding women to combat positions will degrade US fighting capacity. This is incorrect for several reasons. Wars are lost due to poor strategy. With no plans for victory and what happens after defeat of a belligerent failure is inevitable. Low quality leadership in government creates situations that can escalate to longer term conflicts. Flawed foreign policy or lack of a coherent one can result in such military defeats. Women will not degrade the US military; a policy focused on imperial ambitions and aggression will. The role of the US military is to protect the United States, not fight for corporate or neoconservative imperial geopolitical interests. People who decide to enlist should understand you are not fighting for freedom, democracy, or human rights. This could change with new leadership. Yet, the public must become educated about how US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are wars of aggression . Women should not seek to just be combat soldiers, but move up the ranks to positions of leadership. Only when we begin to see women fours star generals, then it can be said there is progress.
American football has become a popular sport in the United States. Its origins come from soccer. Soccer is called football internationally, which tends to confuse American sports fans. American football oddly enough began in the 19th century in Great Britain. There their is a game known as rugby, which would later become American football. A soccer player in Great Britain at a school in Rugby picked up a soccer ball with their hands. This is prohibited by the rules of soccer and from that one rule violation came a new game. The game of rugby reached the United States in 1871. This game from the British transformed into football. Now it is an American tradition being played in universities, public schools, and in professional sports leagues. This sport at first glance appears to be completely male dominated. However, there are women and organizations who are getting involved. While women’s football teams do not get exposure as the mainstream NFL league teams, it is a great development for the sport. Women are also becoming football fans in large numbers. This development has been happening for the past two decades. Despite domestic abuse cases, paid patriotism, and racism in league circles there are still loyal fans. These issues can be addressed with reform in sports organizations.
The history of women in American football starts in 1974. The Women’s Football League was formed with seven teams formed. The pay was low with players only getting $25 a game. Despite this, teams formed and came to play. These teams included the Los Angeles Dandelions, Dallas Bluebonnets, Detroit Demons, Columbus Pacesetters, Fort Worth Shamrocks, and the California Mustangs. Since the 1970s the number of women playing tackle football has increased. The unfortunate reality is that there are not established professional leagues. Women’s amateur leagues have been growing in number over the past two decades. There are about 4,000 women who play tackle football in the United States. Local leagues can be expensive to join, but that does not stop dedicated players. Women come not for the financial rewards, because there no opportunities like in the National Football League.
There still remains a cultural bias that football is a man only game. The game continues to be male dominated, however women began organizing to play a sport they also enjoy. As the years progressed women became part of high school and college football teams. Although small in number this was a testament to breaking barriers. Kathy Klope was a place kicker for the University of Louisville in the 1990s. At the time she was the only woman to play on a National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I-A football team. Title IX stipulates that girls and women should be allowed to try out and play on boys and men’s teams if there is not a division for girls. This would be sex discrimination and so girls were given opportunities to play on boys teams.
A news clip showing a girl in Junior high playing on a football team
This change did not come until the 1980s to 1990s. The Beth Balsey case in New Jersey ruled that she had a right to play on her high school football team. The judge ruled in her favor in 1986. By 1994 it was reported that a total 328 girls were playing on US high school teams according to the National Federation of the State High School Athletic Associations. The girls who have the athletic talent do not have professional leagues to go to as adults, so they may switch to another sport. The thousands of women now take part in amateur leagues. There is a possibility as time progresses professional leagues will be more prevalent. There is the challenge of exposure and the decline in viewership of American football. The loss of viewers could be attributed to bad publicity surrounding domestic abuse and CTE injuries. It could be that being more inclusive with women can repair the damage from such negative incidents.
It will take some years before women’s teams emerge to a level in which they are viewed as widely as the NFL games. There is progress. The Independent Women’s Football League was established in 2000 with a mission to “making the sport available to all women and girls who dream of playing the game. ” This non=profit organization helps with funding teams and organization. The IWFL wants to also “foster an environment of goodwill and sportsmanship.” The IWFL has been a helpful avenue for rising women football players attempting to play at elite levels.
American football just like any other sport has rules. The teams consist of a total of eleven players, which can be alternated. Each team has the responsibility of starting a play on their side of the ball. Players can either be defensive or offensive in terms of position. The offensive players must be lined up in scrimmage. They are seven offensives, but the four of these must be lined up one yard behind the line scrimmage. One to four backs can move parallel to the line of scrimmage. The team that maintains the ball will be called the offense. The defense has the task of preventing the offense from scoring. The offense then has the task of advancing the ball 10 yards every four plays. If they are successful they will achieve a first down. The objective is to score and make touchdowns. The offensive team can lose possession of the football by fumbling (or dropping the ball), missing the field goal, getting tackled in the end zone for safety, kicking the ball to the defensive team, scoring, not getting 10 yards in four downs, and throwing the football to a defensive player for an interception.
If players violate rules, they face penalties. Yards can be lost depending if the violation was by the defense or offense. Personal fouls can result up to 15 yards, while a majority are between 5 to 10 yards. There are numerous violations that can happen in a football game. The false start is when the offense moves prior to the snap. The snap is the moment in which movement is permitted. Offside violations happen when the offense or defense is on the wrong side of the scrimmage line at the time of the snap. A defensive player cannot make contact with an offensive player, because this would be encroachment. Holding another type of violation is when a player grabs another without the ball. It is also illegal to grab a player’s facemask. Kickers and passers are not allowed to be run into after the ball has been kicked.
Intentional grounding happens when a passer throws the ball away from a receiver to avoid possible sacking. Other cases such as ineligible receiver downfield occurs when an offensive player is not eligible receiver and happens to be five yards downfield from the line scrimmage during a forward pass. These are some of the common football infractions that can occur during a game. There are more possible penalties and violations, but these are the basic ones. The point of these rules is to maintain player safety and have fair competition. The referee must be extra vigilant to make sure all rules are enforced. Football has become a major element in US culture. Americans spend millions in total on products and memorabilia of their favorite football teams. A common Thanksgiving tradition is to watch football and play some with family as well as friends. The sport has become part of American identity and a cultural icon.
Iwflsports.com: History. N.p., 6 June 2000. Web. 23 May 2017. <http://www.iwflsports.com/theiwfl/history/>.
Sherrow, Victoria. “Football.” Encyclopedia of Women and Sports. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 1996. 104-05.
Garcia, Ahzia. “Inside the World of Women’s Tackle Football.” CNNMoney. Cable News Network, 13 Feb. 2017. Web. 23 May 2017. <http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/02/news/womens-tackle-football/>.
The bikini division has emerged in strength sport competition and has generated controversy. There are claims that the relatively new category is just there as a sex sells method and that it is designed to phase out the traditional bodybuilding for women. Some have made the claim women got too extreme in appearance causing the move to a more acceptable mainstream model. The general public may never be accepting of women’s sport participation or sports such as these, but there seems to be factions in terms of aesthetic ideals. There is the group that favors a more muscular and larger appearance of the female bodybuilder. Other want a more classic image of the female bodybuilder of the 1970s and 1980s when favoring physique and figure. Fitness was the outgrowth of women who did not favor neither of these models, but wanted to also demonstrate acrobatic skills and gymnastic skills in their routines. These women of the established divisions have made complaints that bikini is not even much of a competitive endeavor. To an extent they may be correct. It would be difficult to distinguish them from an average woman in a bikini or regular bikini model. Other observers claim this represents the death of female bodybuilding and is probably a negative development. This assessment is not entirely accurate. Bikini is still evolving and the female bodybuilding category still exists. There is one positive element is that more women are becoming involved in fitness sports. Some women enjoy the look of muscle so much that they even switch over to the physique and bodybuilding divisions. To comprehend bikini one must examine the attributes of the category. Its rise can be positive or negative depending on a fan’s perspective.
Just like other categories the bikini competitors have judging rules. The first is balance and shape. There is no emphasis on muscle size or definition in particular. There still has to be symmetry presented in the physique that is presented on stage. Skin tone, poise, and complexion are parts of scoring. Overall presentation, which is pivotal to all categories is also part of the total score. These are the general guidelines by the National Physique Committee. These set of standards do seem nebulous, but competitors do seem to be able to present physiques through trial and error. Physique, fitness, and bodybuilder competitors claim that doing this category does not require that much training. That is not correct, because bikini competitors are doing some form of weight training. The difference can be seen when on stage.
Bikini competitors appear leaner just like their bodybuilding, physique, and fitness counterparts. The same process applies to an extent. Cutting fat levels, exercise or training regimens are employed to produce a certain appearance. Bikini may favor women who are sleeker in body and do not have the ability to add size to the level of a physique or bodybuilder competitor. This does give more women a chance to compete who have the desire to do so. Navigating the often contradictory or unclear judging criteria seems to be a challenge for most competitors. Sports such as these are subjective which does cause some confusion. One element that can be agreed on is that judging can be difficult to understand.
One argument that persists is that bikini competitors so not have the look of an athlete. Depending on the sport that is played athletes can have various body types. A tennis player may not look like a weightlifter. The reason is they train for different physical activities. The argument seems to lacks cogency that their is one single athletic appearance. This applies to the bodybuilding sports. Muscle size, definition, conditioning , and symmetry varies among the classes. When one compares a bikini competitor to the average bikini model there is a significant difference.
The women on stage are still defined, but not as large as figure, bodybuilding, or physique competitors. Bikini is relatively new, so it is still evolving. The sport for women as a whole seems to be doing that as well. The critics of bikini seem to forget the history of the sport. The first women bodybuilders of the 1970s almost resemble the bikini competitors of today. As the years progress women’s physique did increase in size. The female bodybuilders had a more lean sleeker look in the 1970s. The 1980s brought a more middle level amount of size as represented by Rachel Mclish and Carla Dunlap. The hypermuscular image was born in the the 1990s with Bev Francis, by started earlier with Kay Baxter. The bikini division wants to resurrect the sleeker body image.
These paradigms have varied over the years causing debates over aesthetics. When women entered bodybuilding there was objection to having them participate. They faced extra scrutiny for their looks . While there were men who embraced this new image, other who were more conservative repudiated women’s involvement. It was inevitable at some point the factions would develop new categories. The 1991 Ms. Olympia was the turning point in the debate. The fitness competitions emerged and the same criticisms were used against it. Later there was acceptance with some female bodybuilders switching over. Bikini competitors just have revived an other aesthetic of the 20th century.
There is a negative aspect to the rise of this division. It could be used by the corporate gatekeepers mainly by the Weider Corporation to phase out female bodybuilding. This may be an attempt to present fitness for women as more marketable seeing as the popularity of standard female bodybuilding has declined. The end of the Ms. Olympia in 2014 demonstrated a decline, but not death. There are still bodybuilding contests for women although not as large in number. Another problem is that some longtime competitors feel that now pro-cards are so easily obtained with the multiple divisions available. The positive part about this is that more women can get involved in the bodybuilding sports. There are attempts to mainstream this underground sport. This does not seem feasible considering the popularity of football, basketball, and the Olympics. The idea that a new division can make this happen is misguided. The only reason it should be there is to give women a fair chance to compete who do not have the size for bodybuilding, figure, physique, or cannot perform the gymnastics of fitness competitions. Sports need divisions and weight classes for the sake of fair competition.
To a person attempting to find out more about the sport to can be confusing. A potential competitor may find it challenging to figure out which division is best for them to compete in. It would probably make more sense to do research before hand before just randomly selecting a division. The judges need to elucidate the differences and standards. Otherwise, it would make more sense just to call these weight classes. This confusion goes to a larger controversy in the sport for women.
The size controversy continues to be an issue in the sport. Critics claim that when women got “too big” that caused the decline of the bodybuilding division and the rise of fitness, figure, and bikini. There could be some truth to this, however that is not the entire story. Women have never been fully accepted into sports. This is due to long term sexist prejudice and dated gender roles. The strength sports cause problems for women who are either viewed as less feminine or “too extreme.” These criticisms are relative. To extreme conservatives women who pursue careers or independence are masculine. Thankfully, there are more open mined individuals. Women have to struggle in most sports to keep them going and expanding. There is a bias that effects each sport for women. The problem with bikini is that there are attempts to reduce it to merely a sex sells model. While the presentation of a muscular physique looks attractive to some, sexual objectification does not help the sport. The idea that if the women were smaller in muscle size that this would improve marketability is not proven. Women’s divisions have lower attendance and the athletes are less than their male counterparts. This was even true back in the golden age of female bodybuilding in the 1990s. There is no reason for women to impose limitations on themselves just because society finds it inappropriate. There is no reason larger physiques cannot still be part of the fitness circle.
The divisions as they are now could solve the size controversy. The split between fans and organizers can be mended as well as competitors. There should be a place for women of various fitness levels. Only if the sport is allowed to thrive and be promoted can this issue be resolved.
The addition of bikini contests does not seem like a negative or positive development. It is still a neophyte division and gradually evolving. There is uncertainty to how it might develop in the distant future or its overall impact. There is at least a positive development among women. More are coming into the fitness world due to the opening of the division. Some even switch over to physique and bodybuilding wanting to reach a higher level. A new generation of women athletes are emerging. Women do not see physical fitness as male only or strange. There were vexed reactions to the additions of fitness and figure competitions. This soon dissipated as athletes proved themselves as talented. Those divisions are now accepted as part of the fitness community. Bikini should at least be given a chance. There will soon be competitors that will impress peers and fans alike putting to rest the debate. The best action women can do in the sport is to show solidarity. There should not be enmity between divisions, but collaboration on certain issues. Unequal pay and limited coverage are problems that should involve every woman in the sport to challenge. Only then can women be fully integrated into a male dominated sport.
The Amazons were a tribe of women warriors that commonly appeared in ancient Greek myths. They were descended from the Ares the God or war and Harmonia the Naiad. The name Amazon was given allegedly because of their one breast. It was thought that amazons removed one their breast to improve archery. The one breast definition may not be a completely accurate description. The etymology of the Greek word Amazones is the only evidence to the possible origins of the word. mazos refers to breasts and ama means without.The myths that were told are often contradictory or have multiple versions. There are some theories that the amazon myth was based on actual women warriors. Historians and scholars have attempted to solve the puzzle through archaeology. Although their has been some leads evidence does not seem conclusive. While their may be a myth of Amazons, the word has cultural connotations. They have appeared in film, comics, and television. One connotation describes an amazon as ” a tall, aggressive, and strong willed woman.” This connotation has some negative attributes,but others are more positive.
The Amazons when they appeared in Greek myth were not there to celebrate the strength of women, but to glorify men. A great feat of a Greek hero was that they were able to slay an Amazon. According to Geek myth the Amazons fought against the Greeks in the Trojan War. The encounter between the Achilles and Penthesilea represents the typical battle between hero and amazon. The amazon queen fought Achilles the hero in combat only to be killed by him. Hercules had to in one of his twelve labors steal the girdle of Hippolyta. Thesus had adventures in which he fought amazons as well. These stories reveal the nature of gender relations in the classical world. They were used as a warning to women not to violate the gender order. These strong Amazon women in various tales either faced defeat or death. Although it appears that there was condemnation of such strong women, there are case in which they were praised. Atlanta although not an Amazon represented their war like spirit and independence in myth. Men challenged Atlanta to foot races for her hand in marriage and if they lost they would be put to death. Hippomenes beat her only with the assistance of Aphrodite . Dropping apples distracted Atlanta and he was able to win.
The subtle message in some of the myths is that an independent woman was an anomaly. Gender roles were in ancient Greek civilization were rigidly defined. A majority of women were usually married by the age of 18. They would live in a system of male guardianship until being passed to the the supervision of her husband. Freedom and legal rights were limited, but in some city-states women had some freedoms which others could not enjoy. Sparta allowed women to engage in physical activity and gain some education. This was not because the society was progressive, but they were attempting to create healthy women who who produce warrior offspring. Athens saw this as repulsive, which had long time conflict with Sparta. It could be possible that some of the Amazon myths were lampooning Spartan women. The amazon myths were probably not just designed to warn women to stay in their place, but also to criticize non-Greek peoples. Women according to ancient Greeks should not resemble the “barbarian” peoples. Although used to justify xenophobic or sexist views of women there are times they were seen in a different context.
Amazons normally are considered a Greek invention, but there are instances of mythical warrior women be mentioned in other civilizations. This wider context is the the image of the mythical warrior woman. The theme appears in Africa, Asia, and Arabia. Some of these mythical figures could have been based on actual living people. Khutulan was a Mongol princess who was the great-granddaughter of Genghis Khan was known to wrestle suitors. Besides that sources reveal that she excelled at horseback riding and archery. Marco Polo even wrote accounts of her exploits. She allegedly beat every man in wrestling and picked a man to become her husband. Khutulan later became a commander in her father’s army. This story almost parallels the Atlanta myth.
When examined from a larger international perspective, warrior woman becomes interchangeable with amazon. China has a long history of warrior women both historical and legendary. This documentations go back as far as the warring states period (246-221 B.C.E). Mulan has been an enduring legend of folklore in Chinese culture. There were accounts of warrior like women in Africa after the Persian conquest in the 6th century B.C.E. Herodotus and Diodrous wrote accounts of women engaged in warfare. There seems to evidence of a this in the Kushite Kingdom and Nubia. The Kandakes were the ruling queens of Kush and were known to lead armies into combat. Amanitore and Shanakdakheto were known to engage in warfare against invaders. There was the problem of Roman and Greek incursions.
Amenirenas was fighting a war against Romans from 27 to 27 B.C.E according to Strabo’s accounts. The Romans also faced defeat at Syene ( the Aswan region). The Romans would continue to be challenged by the Kushites in Africa. Warrior women also appeared in Arabia. Nomads formed a confederation to fight Assyrian dominance in the 700s B.C.E. Zabibi, Samsi, and Zenobia fought Egyptians, Assyrians, and later Roman invaders. The Quedarites confederation produced these fighters. Their rebellions were not always successful, but they had a lasting impact; they inspired many and were remembered through oral traditions.
These women did not live together or were man haters as the Amazon myths state. Seeing as their efforts were impressive a legend developed around them. History does have the tendency to glorify certain individuals almost to the extent they become mythical. Upon further investigation the idea that there existed a tribe of warrior women seems unlikely. It is even more unlikely that there was an established matriarchy.
The possible explanation for the alleged existence of Amazons is that it developed by Greek contact with other peoples. The Scythians and Sarmatians were Central Asian peoples who also were nomadic. The term Scythia was sometimes used in a broader context to mean a cultural zone which included nomad and seminomadic groups that were beyond Thrace. This did include areas such as the Black Sea, northern Anatolia to the Caucus Mountains, passing the Caspian and all the way to Central Asia. Scythians were masters of the Eurasian landmass during a time in antiquity. It appears based on sources from Herodotus that there were multiple Scythian tribes. Pliny claimed there were at least twenty tribes. There tradition was an oral based documentation of history, so one has to be mindful of solely believing a Greek perspective. One interpretation cannot describe in detail the life and civilization of a people. The names for the Scythian tribes included the Saka, Massagetae, Xiongnu, Yuezhi, Sai, and Xianbei. The Greeks would in Herodotus’ words collectively call them Scythians. Women did ride horses and knew archery in Scythian culture. Sarmatians also had women doing these activities. Archaeology suggests that women warriors in this culture was not a rarity.
Many of the Greek myths about Amazons take place in the setting surrounding the Black Sea. There is a possibility that these stories were exaggerations about actual Scythian women warriors. Burial sites provide clues to where these women warriors roamed and fought. Skeletal remains found in Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and the Black Sea region suggests that their reach was quite far. Archaeologists were puzzled at times finding female skeletons with weapons in burials. The assumption was that they were either males or slaves captured during conquest. It can be deduced that captives would never be berried with weapons. This custom was done for warriors. This subject of study is still new and requires further research. The Scythian tribes declined in power by 500 C.E. and with them went a long history beginning in the 7th century B.C.E.. The history and the myths still continue and have had a profound impact on culture.
Amazon as a word continues to be used in negative and positive connotations. The more negative connotation is that it refers to a masculine woman or a woman who is unlady like. With a change in sex politics brought on by the feminist movement, rigid gender roles were challenged. This did not only happen in the West, but anti-colonial feminist ideology became prevalent in the global south. Being strong was not considered a horrible attribute for women. One of the most radical changes besides women entering the public sphere was that entered was thought to be a solely male domain of professional sports. From the rise of Title IX to present women began enjoying sports and physical skills. There has been no point in history in which women have physically developed themselves to the extent of the modern day athlete. While it is true athletic and muscular women did exist before professional sport, they did not have a forum or space for their talent. Women were denied access and opportunities to play sports or develop their physical skills. Now women compete in the Olympics from around the world. The term amazon has in recent history emerged as something more positive. Amazon then becomes a term referring to a physically strong and beautiful woman.
Among fans of athletic and muscular women the term is used in a more laudatory manner. Other than the term amazon the word goddess is commonly used in these circles to describe the women’s power and beauty. These two terms are do of course have different meanings. The goddesses of mythology were immortal and the Amazons were mortal warriors. Thus when the term goddess is used it means a woman athlete has achieved something beyond normal human feats. It should be understood that connotations are not definitions. Connotations imply meanings of words, definitions are precise in their description. When the term is being directed at women in modern times it falls under a connotation. Few of these women are warriors or soldiers. The more negative definition of “tall strong masculine woman” does not fit either. Women who are muscular or athletic vary in height. Masculinity can be defined culturally depending on what time period and social mores. Strong women are still women even though they do not conform to what a culture expects them to be. The only part of the Merriam-Webster definition that seems to be common is the word strong. However, merely having large muscles does not equal immense strength. Weightlifters may have more functional strength than bodybuilders. This is because for bodybuilders the goal is sculpting a physique and inducing muscular hypertrophy.
Strong when used in the context of ancient myths would correlate to skilled in battle. Iconography shows that in art amazons were rarely depicted as muscular. They were shown displaying athletic feats and in combat. Amazons were the most popular art subjects after artistic renditions of Hercules. These art pieces ranged from amphora to relief sculptures in Greek civilization. Athenian art depicts amazons normally in foreign clothing that resembles that of the East. This could suggest that they were making the association with Persians.
This may have been a tactic to get public support from the Greek population for wars against the Persians. Although the term can be confusing to decipher, it can have multiple means to various people. It is however wrong to say the definition is that of ancient Greek and Roman writers which claimed amazons were “single breasted warrior women.” The art of the classical world does not depict amazons as being single breasted. The one breasted attribute did not appear until the fifth century B.C.E.. The idea was that the amazons removed one of their breasts to become better archers and javelin throwers. A simple understanding of anatomy makes one realize that breasts do not prevent women from throwing javelins or being archers. Seeing as mostly the arms and upper body are utilized, this would be the most important factors in being an archer or throwing a javelin. This attribute placed in the Greek myth could be designed to symbolize amazons were barbarian and not part of the normal or acceptable sphere of womanhood. Artemis the goddess of hunting according to myth had both breast and never had a problem with archery. Although not an Amazon, this reveals further meanings in the single breasted definition.
The single breasted element could mean that the Amazon women were hostile to men and motherhood. It was said in legends that Amazons would kill their male children. This seems to be contradicted by myths in which Amazons were lovers of men. Strabo’s myths claimed that Amazons would select men of the Gargarian tribe. Overtime definitions and folklore change dramatically. It continues to have an impact on contemporary culture.
Tropes have been a part of literature, TV, comics, and other forms of media. The Amazon has a presence in media. The Amazonian beauty is a common trope that can be easily spotted. The female protagonist ( or antagonist) is either strong or muscular and happens to be attractive. Her strength is not seen as a negative attribute. Rarely the damsel in distress, she is quick to fight and go to the action. Wonder Woman is an example of the amazonian beauty. She is an protagonist and is admired by the public in the DC universe timeline. Other cartoon and comic characters fit this mold. She Hulk being both tall and formidable in the physique department is another recognizable Amazonian beauty.
This does not only appear in printed media, but in film, video games, and animation. These women who display the heroic physique are normally in action or comedy genre s. Chun li and Cammy White from the Street Fighter series spot athletic physiques. The design choice seems like an obvious one seeing as they are skilled in combat. Fighting games and action adventure games now feature heroines. It seems the Amazon folklore continues in the arts.
There is a trope that also compliments the Amazonian beauty. The Amazon chaser deliberately seeks out the strong and muscular woman. This also extends to fighting skills. The male protagonist or ally like the idea that the female protagonist is capable. What can be seen with this trope is the channeling of the warrior’s spirit. Among the strong woman tropes the Amazonian beauty is the most recognizable. These characters from various media are products of ancient myths. The warrior woman seems to appear in various cultures around the world. The Amazonian beauty although more prevalent in animation and video games can be seen in film. These appearances may either be longer roles or short cameos. The presentations either vary from positive, indifferent, or negative. There seems to be a level of comfort or discomfort with the presence of physically strong women in fiction and in real life.
The folklore continues in various formats and changes depending on what period of history. Myths and legends can be based on actually events. This explains what scholars may think their was at one point some sort of matriarchal society.
The study of Amazon myth have lead a minority of scholars to think that matriarchies may have existed. There were cased in which academics claimed that the Amazons were real. Johann Jacob Bachofen formulated a thesis that humanity began with the rule of womankind, yet switched over to patriarchy. The rise of civilization made this possible according to his thesis. The classical scholar said “women only knew the physical life” and that “the triumph of patriarchy brings with it the liberation from the manifestations of nature.” Although his theories demonstrate an obvious bias, he was correct in one regard. Women’s positions society fluctuated depending on the time period and civilization. There are indications that in Minoan civilization women had higher status. Women had more freedom in Egyptian civilization compared to their Greek counterparts . What really advances a society or civilization is not patriarchy, but science, innovation, and ideas. Dogmatic thought and superstition stifle the advancement of human civilization. The rise of monotheistic religion saw the decreased status of women, because they demanded women’s obedience. The goddesses or gods were discarded in favor one male God. The problem with Bachofen’s theory is that their is no archaeological evidence to support it. The documentation of the Scythians shows that this was not a matriarchy. There has been a tendency to label certain societies matriarchal when women have some freedoms. This was the case when studying African civilizations, when inheritance ( of a throne or property) was matrilineal. These were still male dominated societies. As far as historians and archaeologists know there has never been a society of matriarchy.
The women of Sparta were not part of a matriarchy, but a warrior culture. The point of their vigorous physical activities was too breed stronger warriors. They did have a degree of sexual and legal freedom. This did not mean equality or say in the public sphere. There are several explanations for why patriarchy became dominant. The first would be the rise of property. Men throughout history controlled most of the property and women were either denied access or lost their own in marriage. The legal and political systems favored men and women were not considered citizens or people. Education was denied to women and equal opportunities for employment. The women of the 21st century still face challenges, but their is a shift to women having more power.
The Amazon folklore can be seen in the concept of the warrior woman. This theme can be seen in media and instances in history. Women have been fighting in wars in the past and present. Historical figures such as Queen Nzingah or Joan of Arc are documented as soldiers to their nations of origin.
There is a long tradition of women warriors from around the globe. it has only been recently with the advances in women’s history that scholars began to give them serious investigation. Women served in the American Civil War disguised as men. This happened in both the Union and Confederate armies. The unfortunate aspect was they could not receive veterans benefits because women were not allowed to be part of the military. Women would continue to advance and by 2013 the ban on women in combat was lifted. This did not mean women did not see combat. The Iraq and Afghan war proved the nature of warfare is ever changing. It is a mistake to assume that warrior automatically means male. This notion still is present. Gradually, it will change as more women become involved in conflicts.
An American woman disguising her self for combat duty during the American Civil War
Mino warrior with the head of her slain opponent.
The attitude toward women in war either is hostile or supportive. This divide in opinion seems to parallel in Greek myth the feelings toward the Amazons. The differences here is that the historical figures are not myths. History can be lost if it is not documented through an oral tradition, collection of artifacts, or written account. The word Amazon was used to describe the Mino warriors in Dahomey in the 19th century. Dahomey ( modern day Benin) was another one of history’s warrior cultures similar to Sparta and japan. The difference was that women were allowed to be warriors and during this period fought to keep the French Empire at bay. They could not withstand French fire power and Dahomey fell in 1890. The Mino warriors fought with great skill and tenacity. The French recognized this in their accounts. If one examines history their should be little debate on women in combat. It has been done before; the question is whether or not the military institutions will change their views on women’s roles.
The examination of myths and history leads to a conclusion in the discourse. There has emerged a new Amazon. This image is a positive one rather than negative. The new Amazon embraces physical strength and does not see it as a male only attribute. Amazon feminism emerged out of the myths and real life women of strength. This feminist theory embraces promoting physical prowess among women as means of gender equality. It seeks to challenge the weaker sex stereotype and embrace the image of the strong woman. Most importantly the theory and belief wants to show that women can be powerful and feminine.
There is also a change mentality. Now that women have found the benefits and joys of exercise or physical activity, they want to develop their physical skills to the maximum. Crossfit and weightlifting are becoming more appealing to a female demographic. Although this is a small circle, there is a level acceptance that has not been witness before. The image they present makes a powerful and dramatic statement. They may not realize it shows the possibilities of women’s physical capacities. The timid or helpless image of women is dismantled by their acts. Women often say they gain a new sense of confidence in their new found abilities. Body image issues do not bother them as much and they have a new feeling of well being. It is clear that the Amazons of Greek legend did not exist. but there are women who are more Amazon than any ancient Greek could imagine. Although it seems the highly developed physiques are still not accepted, there are a group of men who find it attractive. Some muscle on women has been accepted by the general public to an extent. There seems to be a small movement toward body acceptance. The women and men who dislike societal beauty standards choose their own . This group of women embrace a strong and muscular look doubtless of what others think.
The women athletes of the modern times are the manifestations of the amazon feminism that believed women should have physical prowess. Myths and folklore have a huge impact in language, culture, and history. The Amazon myth continues to have a presence, even though many do not have an understanding of its origins. The word itself can be confusing. If world civilization were to collapse now it could be possible that in the future it would difficult to convince people that women like this existed. There are civilizations and groups that may never be known about because there are no artifacts to prove they existed. While the Greek writings are myths, there were women warriors among the Scythian tribes. The Steppes hold vast hidden history waiting to be uncovered. The fascination with strong women is not a recent phenomenon, but a longtime theme that has continued through the ages.
Mayor, Adrienne. The Amazons Lives and Legends of Warrior Women Across The
Ancient World. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2014.
Wilde, Lyn. On The Trial of Women Warriors The Amazons in Myth and History.
New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000.
Fantham, Elaine. Women in the Classical World. New York : Oxford University Press,
Foreman, Amanda. “The Amazon Women: Is There Any Truth Behind the Myth?”Smithsonian.com. Smithsonian Institution, 01 Apr. 2014. Web. 15 May 2017. <http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/amazon-women-there-any-truth-behind-myth-180950188/>.